What is the most efficient graph data structure in Python? [closed]

What is the most efficient graph data structure in Python? [closed]

"Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.

Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.

Closed 5 years ago.

Improve this question

I need to be able to manipulate a large (10^7 nodes) graph in python. The data corresponding to each node/edge is minimal, say, a small number of strings. What is the most efficient, in terms of memory and speed, way of doing this?

A dict of dicts is more flexible and simpler to implement, but I intuitively expect a list of lists to be faster. The list option would also require that I keep the data separate from the structure, while dicts would allow for something of the sort:

graph[I][J][""Property""]=""value""

What would you suggest?

Yes, I should have been a bit clearer on what I mean by efficiency. In this particular case I mean it in terms of random access retrieval.

Loading the data in to memory isn't a huge problem. That's done once and for all. The time consuming part is visiting the nodes so I can extract the information and measure the metrics I'm interested in.

I hadn't considered making each node a class (properties are the same for all nodes) but it seems like that would add an extra layer of overhead? I was hoping someone would have some direct experience with a similar case that they could share. After all, graphs are one of the most common abstractions in CS."

Asked by: Guest | Views: 437

Total answers/comments: 6

Comments display order:

Guest [Entry]

"I would strongly advocate you look at NetworkX. It's a battle-tested war horse and the first tool most 'research' types reach for when they need to do analysis of network based data. I have manipulated graphs with 100s of thousands of edges without problem on a notebook. Its feature rich and very easy to use. You will find yourself focusing more on the problem at hand rather than the details in the underlying implementation.

Example of Erdős-Rényi random graph generation and analysis

""""""
Create an G{n,m} random graph with n nodes and m edges
and report some properties.

This graph is sometimes called the Erd##[m~Qs-Rényi graph
but is different from G{n,p} or binomial_graph which is also
sometimes called the Erd##[m~Qs-Rényi graph.
""""""
__author__ = """"""Aric Hagberg (hagberg@lanl.gov)""""""
__credits__ = """"""""""""
# Copyright © 2004-2006 by
# Aric Hagberg
# Dan Schult
# Pieter Swart
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License
# http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/lesser.html

from networkx import *
import sys

n=10 # 10 nodes
m=20 # 20 edges

G=gnm_random_graph(n,m)

# some properties
print ""node degree clustering""
for v in nodes(G):
print v,degree(G,v),clustering(G,v)

# print the adjacency list to terminal
write_adjlist(G,sys.stdout)

Visualizations are also straightforward:

More visualization: http://jonschull.blogspot.com/2008/08/graph-visualization.html"

Guest [Entry]

Even though this question is now quite old, I think it is worthwhile to mention my own python module for graph manipulation called graph-tool. It is very efficient, since the data structures and algorithms are implemented in C++, with template metaprograming, using the Boost Graph Library. Therefore its performance (both in memory usage and runtime) is comparable to a pure C++ library, and can be orders of magnitude better than typical python code, without sacrificing ease of use. I use it myself constantly to work with very large graphs.

Guest [Entry]

As already mentioned, NetworkX is very good, with another option being igraph. Both modules will have most (if not all) the analysis tools you're likely to need, and both libraries are routinely used with large networks.

Guest [Entry]

A dictionary may also contain overhead, depending on the actual implementation. A hashtable usually contain some prime number of available nodes to begin with, even though you might only use a couple of the nodes.

Guest [Entry]

"As I understand it, random access is in constant time for both Python's dicts and lists, the difference is that you can only do random access of integer indexes with lists. I'm assuming that you need to lookup a node by its label, so you want a dict of dicts.

However, on the performance front, loading it into memory may not be a problem, but if you use too much you'll end up swapping to disk, which will kill the performance of even Python's highly efficient dicts. Try to keep memory usage down as much as possible. Also, RAM is amazingly cheap right now; if you do this kind of thing a lot, there's no reason not to have at least 4GB.

If you'd like advice on keeping memory usage down, give some more information about the kind of information you're tracking for each node."

Atasuz [Entry]

generic atorvastatin <a href="https://lipiws.top/">lipitor 10mg canada</a> lipitor 20mg brand